Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Robert C. Norman v. Spokane-Portland & Seattle Railway Co., a Corporation

192 F.2d 1020

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1951-12-05
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. This is a suit against a railroad company under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., by an .employee of a bona fide independent contractor. The appeal is from a judgment dismissing the employee’s suit. The judgment is affirmed for the reason given in the district court’s opinion, D.C., 101 F.Supp. 350.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Robert C. Norman v. Spokane-Portland & Seattle Railway Co., a Corporation. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
NORMAN v. SPOKANE-PORTLAND SEATTLE RY. CO.,192 F.2d 1020(9th Cir. 1951)
Robert C. NORMAN, Appellant, v. SPOKANE-PORTLAND SEATTLE RAILWAY CO., a
Corporation, Appellee.
No. 12882.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
December 5, 1951.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; James Alger Fee, Judge.
Elton Watkins, Portland, Or., for appellant.

Hugh L. Biggs, George H. Fraser, Cleveland C. Cory, Hart, Spencer, McCulloch, Rockwood Davies, all of Portland, Or., for appellee.
Before HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges, and LEMMON, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
This is a suit against a railroad company under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., by an employee of a bona fide independent contractor. The appeal is from a judgment dismissing the employee's suit. The judgment is affirmed for the reason given in the district court's opinion, D.C.,101 F. Supp. 350.Page 1