Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

William J. Gardner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

William J. Gardner v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 191 F.2d 857 (6th Cir. 1951)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1951-10-16
Topic: bankruptcy

PER CURIAM. This petition for review filed by the taxpayer came on to he heard on the record and on the briefs and oral arguments of the attorneys for the parties; And it appearing from the opinion of the Tax Court of the United States that its decision adjudging a deficiency in income tax for the year 1945 is correct; The decision is accordingly ordered to be affirmed. 14 T.C. 1445.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed William J. Gardner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

GARDNER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,191 F.2d 857(6th Cir. 1951)

William J. GARDNER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent.

No. 11279.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

October 16, 1951.

Petition for Review of a Decision of the Tax Court.

L.F. Loux, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.

Theron L. Caudle, Charles Oliphant, Rollin H. Transue, Ellis N. Slack, A.F. Prescott, and Richard D. Harrison, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This petition for review filed by the taxpayer came on to be heard on the record and on the briefs and oral arguments of the attorneys for the parties;

And it appearing from the opinion of the Tax Court of the United States that its decision adjudging a deficiency in income tax for the year 1945 is correct;

The decision is accordingly ordered to be affirmed.14 T.C. 1445.Page 858