Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Detroit Gasket & Manufacturing Company

179 F.2d 241

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1949-12-08
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, and the court being duly advised, Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the petition for enforcement of the order of the. National Labor Relations Board be and the same is hereby denied. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Company v. National Labor Relations Board et al., 338 U.S. 355, 70 S.Ct. 166; Aluminum Co. of America v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed National Labor Relations Board v. Detroit Gasket & Manufacturing Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
NATIONAL LABOR BD. v. DETROIT GASKET,179 F.2d 241(6th Cir. 1949)
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DETROIT GASKET
MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 10936.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
December 8, 1949.
Robert N. Denham, Washington, D.C., Frank H. Bowen, Detroit, Mich., Stephen Reynolds, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Cook, Beake, Miller, Wrock Cross, Detroit, Mich., Bethel B. Kelley, Detroit, Mich., for respondent.
Before SIMONS, MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the petition for enforcement of the order of the National Labor Relations Board be and the same is hereby denied. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Company v. National Labor Relations Board et al.,338 U.S. 355,70 S.Ct. 166; Aluminum Co. of America v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir.,159 F.2d 523.