Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

United States ex rel. Zabadlija v. Garfinkel

173 F.2d 222

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1949-01-27
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from the order of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania following that Court’s denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Since the opinion of the Court below, 77 F. Supp. 751, there has been decided in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana the case of Kava-dias v. Cross, 1948, 82 F.Supp. 716, in which Judge Swygert wrote an opinion which fully covers the question presented by the immediate appeal.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States ex rel. Zabadlija v. Garfinkel. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
UNITED STATES EX REL. ZABADLIJA v. GARFINKEL,173 F.2d 222(3rd Cir. 1949)
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Dragutin ZABADLIJA, Also Known as Charles
Anton or Antonio Zabadlija, Appellant, v. Charles GARFINKEL, Officer in
Charge, Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department
of Justice.
No. 9730.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued January 18, 1949.
Decided January 27, 1949.
Appeal from the United States District Court for Western District of Pennsylvania; Robert M. Gibson, Judge.
Zeno Fritz, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Frank J. Zappala, of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Maurice A. Roberts, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Owen M. Burns, U.S. Atty., and Elliott W. Finkel, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN, and O'CONNELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the order of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania following that Court's denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Since the opinion of the Court below,77 F. Supp. 751, there has been decided in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana the case of Kavadias v. Cross, 1948,82 F. Supp. 716, in which Judge Swygert wrote an opinion which fully covers the question presented by the immediate appeal. We think Judge Swygert was right and that the District Judge in this case was right.

The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed.Page 223