Opinion · United States Court of Claims

Phillips Pipe Line Co. v. United States

Phillips Pipe Line Co. v. United States, 40 F. Supp. 981 (Ct. Cl. 1941)

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Claims
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1941-10-06
Topic
general

JoNes, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: Is natural gasoline a liquid product of crude petroleum? That is the single issue in this case. *472The Revenue Act of 19321 imposes a tax upon “all transportation of crude petroleum and the liquid products thereof by pipe line.” The plaintiff paid taxes in the sum of $264;784.38 under the act on natural or casinghead gasoline which had been transported by pipe line. A refund of these taxes is sought on the ground that they were illegally collected. It is claimed that this type of gasoline is not a product of crude petroleum, but is a product of natural gas instead, and that it therefore does not fall within the terms of the revenue act. The evidence reveals a decided conflict among experts, text writers, and laymen.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Phillips Pipe Line Co. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion