Opinion · United States Court of Claims

Binghamton Construction Co. v. United States

107 F. Supp. 712

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Claims
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1952-10-07
Topic
general

Whitaker, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff brings this suit to recover under its contract with the War Department Corps of Engineers for the construction of a flood wall along the Chemung River in Elmira, New York. Plaintiff presents three claims as follows: Claim for reimbursement of wage rates paid to carpenters, laborers, and concrete puddlers_$15,697.38 Claim regarding measurement of' sheeting and shoring— 14,785.55 Claim for finishing of concrete_ 6,934.26 Total_ 37,317.19 Plaintiff’s first claim is that it was misled by defendant as to the wages it would be required to pay in carrying out the *834contract. Briefly stated, the facts anent this controversy are these: On March 29, 1941, plaintiff received from the Bingham-ton, New York, District office of the Corps of Engineers an invitation to bid upon the construction of Section 1 of the Elmira Flood Protection Project. .Plaintiff submitted a bid which defendant accepted on May 14, 1941. Formal notice to proceed was issued on June 5,1941. The Standard Government Form of Invitation to Bid contained the following provision: Investigation of Conditions. — Bidders are expected to visit the locality of the work and to make their own estimates of the facilities needed, the difficulties attending the execution of the proposed contract, including local conditions, availability of labor, uncertainties of weather, and other contingencies. * * * Failure to acquaint himself with all available information concerni…

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Binghamton Construction Co. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions