Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Jordan
State v. Jordan, 295 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2010)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2010-02-04
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 628 (AC 29163), is granted, limited to the following issues: “Did the Appellate Court properly determine that (1) the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss counsel, and (2) the trial court did not improperly restrict cross-examination of a state’s witness by the defendant?”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Jordan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 628 (AC 29163), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that (1) the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss counsel, and (2) the trial court did not improperly restrict cross-examination of a state’s witness by the defendant?”