Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Milotte
279 Conn. 906
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2006-06-29
- Topic
- general
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 95 Conn. App. 616 (AC 26217), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the trial court properly granted the defendant-appellee’s motion to suppress evidence resulting from a warrantless investigatory stop of his vehicle, on the ground that the police officer lacked a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity to justify the stop?” Martin Zeldis, public defender, in opposition. Decided June 29, 2006
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Milotte. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 95 Conn. App. 616 (AC 26217), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the trial court properly granted the defendant-appellee’s motion to suppress evidence resulting from a warrantless investigatory stop of his vehicle, on the ground that the police officer lacked a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity to justify the stop?”
Martin Zeldis, public defender, in opposition. Decided June 29, 2006