Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Neuhaus v. Decholnoky
271 Conn. 904
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2004-09-08
- Topic
- commercial
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 576 (AC 23946), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court improperly determine that the plaintiffs’ claims against the named defendant, Corinne DeCholnoky, were barred by the three year repose section of General Statutes § 52-584, and that the continuing course of conduct doctrine did not apply?”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Neuhaus v. Decholnoky. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 576 (AC 23946), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court improperly determine that the plaintiffs’ claims against the named defendant, Corinne DeCholnoky, were barred by the three year repose section of General Statutes § 52-584, and that the continuing course of conduct doctrine did not apply?”