Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Smith
258 Conn. 930
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2001-10-10
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 126 (AC 20829), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court was not required to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of manslaughter in the first degree?” James B. Streeto, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Susann E. Gill, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Smith. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 126 (AC 20829), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court was not required to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of manslaughter in the first degree?”
James B. Streeto, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Susann E. Gill, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 10, 2001