Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Segal v. Segal
258 Conn. 927
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2001-10-10
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 17 (AC 19485), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the money judgment rendered in the defendant’s favor in Nevada is unenforceable in this state, despite the plaintiff debtor’s failure to comply with General Statutes § 52-606 (a), which requires proof that he has furnished security for the satisfaction of the Nevada judgment on appeal as required by Nevada law?”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Segal v. Segal. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
The defendant’s cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 17 (AC 19485), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the money judgment rendered in the defendant’s favor in Nevada is unenforceable in this state, despite the plaintiff debtor’s failure to comply with General Statutes § 52-606 (a), which requires proof that he has furnished security for the satisfaction of the Nevada judgment on appeal as required by Nevada law?”