Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Brocuglio

258 Conn. 908

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2001-09-20
Topic: general

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 93 (AC 18520), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s conduct did not dissipate the taint from the police officers’ illegal entry into the backyard of the *909defendant’s home, and that, therefore, the exclusionary rule regarding the suppression of the evidence derives from that entry?” The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16590. Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Jon L.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Brocuglio. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 93 (AC 18520), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s conduct did not dissipate the taint from the police officers’ illegal entry into the backyard of the *909 defendant’s home, and that, therefore, the exclusionary rule regarding the suppression of the evidence derives from that entry?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16590. Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Jon L. Schoenhom, in opposition. Decided September 20, 2001

SULLIVAN, C. J., and VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.