Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Payne
257 Conn. 904
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2001-07-05
- Topic
- litigation
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 583 (AC 20232), is granted, limited to the following issue: “In the exercise of our supervisory authority over the administration of justice, should the defendant be afforded a new trial due to pervasive prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument?” ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided July 5, 2001
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Payne. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 583 (AC 20232), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“In the exercise of our supervisory authority over the administration of justice, should the defendant be afforded a new trial due to pervasive prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument?”
ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided July 5, 2001