Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Clark
256 Conn. 905
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2001-04-11
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 182 (AC 18365), is granted, limited to the following issues: “1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s instruction, limiting the jury’s use of the evidence regarding the effect of Leroy Townsend’s use of marijuana on his credibility, was proper?” “2. If the answer to the first question is ‘no,’ was the error harmless?”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Clark. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 182 (AC 18365), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s instruction, limiting the jury’s use of the evidence regarding the effect of Leroy Townsend’s use of marijuana on his credibility, was proper?”
“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘no,’ was the error harmless?”