Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

Webster Bank v. Zak

255 Conn. 946

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2001-02-28
Topic
bankruptcy

The defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 402 (AC 20906), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for factual findings regarding the standing of the defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC?” SULLIVAN, C. J., and ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition. *947The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16489. Kerry M. Wisser and Nathan A.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Webster Bank v. Zak. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

The defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 402 (AC 20906), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for factual findings regarding the standing of the defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC?”

SULLIVAN, C. J., and ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

*947 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16489. Kerry M. Wisser and Nathan A. Schatz, in support of the petition. Jeffrey T. Beatty, in opposition. Decided February 28, 2001