Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Singh
State v. Singh, 255 Conn. 935 (Conn. 2001)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2001-02-07
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 59 Conn. App. 638 (AC 19243), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the prosecutor’s cross-examination of the defendant and his closing argument to the jury constitute prosecutorial misconduct in violation of the defendant’s federal constitutional right to a fair trial?” *936The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16476. Jeremiah Donovan, in support of the petition. Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Singh. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 59 Conn. App. 638 (AC 19243), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the prosecutor’s cross-examination of the defendant and his closing argument to the jury constitute prosecutorial misconduct in violation of the defendant’s federal constitutional right to a fair trial?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.