Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Flint v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., 233 Conn. 905 (Conn. 1995)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 1995-04-24
Topic: general

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 162 (AC 12907), is granted, limited to the following issue: *906Decided April 24, 1995 William F. Gallagher and Cynthia C. Bott, in support of the petition. John W.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 162 (AC 12907), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*906 Decided April 24, 1995 William F. Gallagher and Cynthia C. Bott, in support of the petition. John W. Steinmetz, David Thomas Ryan and Craig A. Raabe, in opposition.

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff’s amendments to his complaint did not enlarge the existing issues or present new issues of fact so as to entitle him to claim a jury trial pursuant to General Statutes § 52-215?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15248.