Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Metropolitan District Commission v. American Federation of State
233 Conn. 904
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1995-04-24
- Topic
- bankruptcy
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 1 (AC 13197), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the arbitrators’ failure to comply with § 31-91-45 (a) of the Regulations of *905Connecticut State Agencies did not require that the arbitrators’ award be vacated?” Decided April 24, 1995 Anthony J. Palermino, in support of the petition. The Supreme Court, docket number is SC 15252.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Metropolitan District Commission v. American Federation of State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 1 (AC 13197), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the arbitrators’ failure to comply with § 31-91-45 (a) of the Regulations ofDecided April 24, 1995 Anthony J. Palermino, in support of the petition.*905 Connecticut State Agencies did not require that the arbitrators’ award be vacated?”
The Supreme Court, docket number is SC 15252.