Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sung v. Butterworth
231 Conn. 940
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1994-12-12
- Topic
- bankruptcy
The named plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 35 Conn. App. 154 (AC 12102), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Whether the issue was incorrectly framed by the Appellate Court as the failure of the [named] plaintiff to furnish the required notice pursuant to Practice Book § 220 (D) when the issue was whether, under the circumstances of this case, a treating physician can be compelled to furnish expert testimony on the standard of care?”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sung v. Butterworth. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The named plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 35 Conn. App. 154 (AC 12102), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the issue was incorrectly framed by the Appellate Court as the failure of the [named] plaintiff to furnish the required notice pursuant to Practice Book § 220 (D) when the issue was whether, under the circumstances of this case, a treating physician can be compelled to furnish expert testimony on the standard of care?”