Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Robins

231 Conn. 917

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 1994-09-20
Topic: employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 694 (AC 11321), is granted, limited to the following issue: *918Decided September 20, 1994 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15046. Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Mary H. Lesser, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. “Whether the Appellate Court correctly decided that the state did not have to show as an element of larceny by defrauding a public community that the defendant obtained benefits to which he was not otherwise entitled.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Robins. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 694 (AC 11321), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*918 Decided September 20, 1994 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15046. Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Mary H. Lesser, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

“Whether the Appellate Court correctly decided that the state did not have to show as an element of larceny by defrauding a public community that the defendant obtained benefits to which he was not otherwise entitled.”