Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Novoa
223 Conn. 905
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1992-06-25
- Topic
- bankruptcy
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 596, is granted, limited to the following question: Bruce A. Sturman, public defender, in support of the petition. Kevin T. Kane, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Novoa. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 596, is granted, limited to the following question:
Bruce A. Sturman, public defender, in support of the petition. Kevin T. Kane, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided June 25, 1992“In the circumstances of this case, was the use of wiretap evidence permitted by the provisions of General Statutes §§ 54-41p (b) and 54-41b?”