Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

VASTA v. CROMAN, 95 Conn. App. 903 (2006)

CAROLE VASTA v. CHARLOTTE CROMAN, CONSERVATOR (PERSON & ESTATEOF ROSALIE SCHIAVO), 95 Conn. App. 903 (Conn. App. Ct. 2006)

Type
Opinion
Court
Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2006-05-23
Topic
general

VASTA v. CROMAN, 95 Conn. App. 903 (2006) CAROLE VASTA v. CHARLOTTE CROMAN, CONSERVATOR (PERSON AND ESTATEOF ROSALIE SCHIAVO), ET AL. No.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed VASTA v. CROMAN, 95 Conn. App. 903 (2006). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

VASTA v. CROMAN,95 Conn. App. 903(2006)
CAROLE VASTAv.CHARLOTTE CROMAN, CONSERVATOR (PERSON AND ESTATE
OF ROSALIE SCHIAVO), ET AL.
No. (AC 26546).
Appellate Court of Connecticut
Flynn, C. J., and Schaller and Bishop, Js.
Submitted on briefs March 31, 2006.
Officially released May 23, 2006.
Named defendant's appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Middlesex,Aurigemma, J.; Silbert, J.
Per Curiam.
Memorandum Decisions.

The judgment is affirmed.