Opinion · Connecticut Superior Court Opinions

BOWMAN v. PARKER BOWMAN BAKING CO., 2 Conn. Sup. 22 (1935)

HAROLD R. BOWMAN v. PARKER BOWMAN BAKING Co., INC., 2 Conn. Super. Ct. 22 (Superior CourtNew Haven County 1935)

Type
Opinion
Court
Connecticut Superior Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
1935-01-01
Topic
general

BOWMAN v. PARKER BOWMAN BAKING CO., 2 Conn. Sup. 22 (1935) HAROLD R. BOWMAN vs. PARKER BOWMAN BAKING COMPANY, INC.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BOWMAN v. PARKER BOWMAN BAKING CO., 2 Conn. Sup. 22 (1935). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BOWMAN v. PARKER BOWMAN BAKING CO.,2 Conn. Sup. 22(1935)
HAROLD R. BOWMAN vs. PARKER BOWMAN BAKING COMPANY, INC.
File No. 44071
Superior Court
New Haven County
Present: Hon. FRANK P. McEVOY, Judge.
Curtis Thompson, Attorney for the Receiver.
Receiver held not liable for claims of employees for over-time wages under N.R.A. Codes.
MEMORANDUM FILED APRIL 30, 1935.
McEVOY, J.
This motion is in connection with a letter dated March 22, 1935, written by Morgan R. Mooney, Esq., Labor Compliance Officer, which is marked Exhibit Afn*in Receiver's motion as to alleged wage claims.

The basis of these claims seems to be that it is alleged that these various employees were employed by Parker Bowman Baking Company.

The alleged claims for wages do not grow out of an employment by Parker Bowman Baking Company but they arise out of the conduct of the business of that concern by the Receiver.
under these circumstances the Receiver is not responsible nor liable for any of the payments set up in these claims and the Receiver is instructed not to pay any of these claims and to disallow them.
  1. Exhibit A, pointed out that forty hours a week is the maximum as set by the baking industry code and that an investigation had indicated this had been violated. In advising them to file a claim for time and one-half, as provided by the code for overtime, he stated, "it is customary for the N.R.A. to adjust such violations, and it is the opinion of this office that you have a legal and enforceable claim for that amount. For this reason, I am advising that you file claim with the Superior Court." ↩