Opinion · Supreme Court of Colorado

Romero v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railway Co.

183 Colo. 32

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Colorado
Jurisdiction: Colorado
Date: 1973-10-01
Topic: general

MR. JUSTICE DAY dissenting: My dissent is principally confined to point III of the majority opinion. I believe the Colorado Court of Appeals was correct in ruling that there was contributory negligence as a matter of law in this case. I would, therefore, affirm the Court of Appeals’ decision. MR.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Romero v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railway Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MR. JUSTICE DAY

dissenting:

My dissent is principally confined to point III of the majority opinion. I believe the Colorado Court of Appeals was correct in ruling that there was contributory negligence as a matter of law in this case. I would, therefore, affirm the Court of Appeals’ decision.

MR. JUSTICE HODGES authorizes me to state that he joins me in this dissent.