Opinion · California Supreme Court

Dias v. Phillips

59 Cal. 293

Type
Opinion
Court
California Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
California
Date
1881-07-15
Topic
estate-planning

By Court: Plaintiff brings this suit in his individual right, and also in his representative capacity, as executor. A demurrer to the complaint was filed, on behalf of defendant, and was overruled by the Court. The question was raised by the demurrer whether the suit was properly brought by the plaintiff in a double capacity, and we think the objection to the complaint should have been sustained. The right of action was in him or in the estate, and not in both. The judgment is that the plaintiffs I.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dias v. Phillips. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
By Court:

Plaintiff brings this suit in his individual right, and also in his representative capacity, as executor. A demurrer to the complaint was filed, on behalf of defendant, and was overruled by the Court.

The question was raised by the demurrer whether the suit was properly brought by the plaintiff in a double capacity, and we think the objection to the complaint should have been sustained. The right of action was in him or in the estate, and not in both.

The judgment is that the plaintiffs I. L. Dias and I. L. Dias, as executor of the last will and testament of A. H. L. Dias, deceased, do recover, etc. We think the judgment can not be sustained.

Judgment reversed.