Opinion · California Supreme Court
People v. Boyle
People v. Boyle, 116 Cal. 658 (Cal. 1897)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- California Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- California
- Date
- 1897-05-06
- Topic
- general
The Court. The defendant was convicted of a felony, technically designated in the information as an assault with intent to commit the infamous crime against nature. He appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial. The facts of the case do not make out the offense of which the defendant has been convicted. It has been so held in at least two cases.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Boyle. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 20 opinions
The defendant was convicted of a felony, technically designated in the information as an assault with intent to commit the infamous crime against nature. He appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial. The facts of the case do not make out the offense of which the defendant has been convicted. It has been so held in at least two cases. (See Prindle v. State, 31 Tex. Crim. Rep. 551; 37 Am. St. Rep. 833; 1 Wharton on Criminal Law, sec. 575.)
Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded.