Opinion · Nylaw New York
MAGUIRE v. MONAGHAN, 285 App. Div. 926 (1955)
EDWARD C. MAGUIRE et al., Copartners Doing Bus. under the Name ofMAGUIRE, FRUTKIN, WALDIE RIPPE, Appellants, v. GEORGE P. MONAGHAN, asCommissioner of & Constituting the State Harness Racing Comm’n, etal., Respondents., 285 A.D. 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1955)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1955-03-01
- Topic
- general
MAGUIRE v. MONAGHAN, 285 App. Div. 926 (1955) EDWARD C. MAGUIRE et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name ofMAGUIRE, FRUTKIN, WALDIE RIPPE, Appellants, v. GEORGE P.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MAGUIRE v. MONAGHAN, 285 App. Div. 926 (1955). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
MAGUIRE v. MONAGHAN,285 App. Div. 926(1955)
EDWARD C. MAGUIRE et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of
MAGUIRE, FRUTKIN, WALDIE RIPPE, Appellants, v. GEORGE P. MONAGHAN, as
Commissioner of and Constituting the State Harness Racing Commission, et
al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
March 1, 1955.
Present — Peck, P.J., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ. [202 Misc. 550.] [Seepost, pp. 1049, 1129.]