Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF McDONALD v. NORTON, 281 App. Div. 830 (1953)

In the Matter of MILES F. McDONALD, as Dist. Att’y of the County ofKings, Petitioner, against ALFRED v. NORTON, as a Justice of the SupremeCourt of the State of N.Y., et al., Respondents., 281 A.D. 830 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1953)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1953-02-02
Topic: general

MATTER OF McDONALD v. NORTON, 281 App. Div. 830 (1953) In the Matter of MILES F. McDONALD, as District Attorney of the County ofKings, Petitioner, against ALFRED V. NORTON, as a Justice of the SupremeCourt of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF McDONALD v. NORTON, 281 App. Div. 830 (1953). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF McDONALD v. NORTON,281 App. Div. 830(1953)

In the Matter of MILES F. McDONALD, as District Attorney of the County of

Kings, Petitioner, against ALFRED V. NORTON, as a Justice of the Supreme

Court of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

February 2, 1953.

Application denied and proceeding dismissed, without costs. The respondent Justice of the Supreme Court, by his decision, has not indicated that he is proceeding contrary to the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 344 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, or that he has exceeded the powers thereby granted. (Cf.Matterof Murphyv.Supreme Court,294 N.Y. 440,445.)

Present — Adel, Acting P.J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.