Opinion · Nylaw New York
EPSTEIN v. LEONARD'S BOOTERY, INC., 280 App. Div. 791 (1952)
BETH S. EPSTEIN, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, HARRY EPSTEIN, et al.,Respondents, v. LEONARD'S BOOTERY, INC., Appellant., 280 A.D. 791 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1952)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1952-06-02
- Topic
- general
EPSTEIN v. LEONARD'S BOOTERY, INC., 280 App. Div. 791 (1952) BETH S. EPSTEIN, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, HARRY EPSTEIN, et al.,Respondents, v. LEONARD'S BOOTERY, INC., Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed EPSTEIN v. LEONARD'S BOOTERY, INC., 280 App. Div. 791 (1952). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
EPSTEIN v. LEONARD'S BOOTERY, INC.,280 App. Div. 791(1952)
BETH S. EPSTEIN, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, HARRY EPSTEIN, et al.,
Respondents, v. LEONARD'S BOOTERY, INC., Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
June 2, 1952.
Present — Nolan, P.J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.