Opinion · Nylaw New York

ABRAMS v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, 278 App. Div. 951 (1951)

CHERNE ABRAMS, Respondent, v. Md. Cas. Co., Appellant., 278 A.D. 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1951)

Type: Opinion
Court: New York
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1951-06-11
Topic: general

ABRAMS v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, 278 App. Div. 951 (1951) CHERNE ABRAMS, Respondent, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. June 11, 1951.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ABRAMS v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, 278 App. Div. 951 (1951). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ABRAMS v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY,278 App. Div. 951(1951)

CHERNE ABRAMS, Respondent, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

June 11, 1951.

In an action, under section 167 Ins. of the Insurance Law, to recover upon a policy of automobile liability insurance, judgment entered on an order granting respondent's motion for summary judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Johnston, Acting P.J., Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to deny the motion, on the ground that the moving papers fail to set forth evidentiary facts establishing the cause of action sufficiently to entitle plaintiff to judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.