Opinion · Nylaw New York

RABINOWITZ v. KAISER-FRAZER CORPORATION, 278 App. Div. 584 (1951)

JOSEPH RABINOWITZ, Respondent, v. KAISER-FRAZER Corp., Appellant, etal., Defendants., 278 A.D. 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1951)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1951-01-22
Topic: general

RABINOWITZ v. KAISER-FRAZER CORPORATION, 278 App. Div. 584 (1951) JOSEPH RABINOWITZ, Respondent, v. KAISER-FRAZER CORPORATION, Appellant, etal., Defendants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. January 22, 1951.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed RABINOWITZ v. KAISER-FRAZER CORPORATION, 278 App. Div. 584 (1951). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

RABINOWITZ v. KAISER-FRAZER CORPORATION,278 App. Div. 584(1951)

JOSEPH RABINOWITZ, Respondent, v. KAISER-FRAZER CORPORATION, Appellant, et

al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

January 22, 1951.

Resettled order denying appellant's motion to vacate the service of summons, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Carswell, Acting P.J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [198 Misc. 707.] [Seepost, p. 666.]