Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF BOWERY SAVINGS BANK, 274 App. Div. 982 (1948)

In the Matter of BOWERY Sav. BANK, Respondent.ERNEST F. EIDLITZ et al., Copartners Doing Bus. under the Name ofEIDLITZ, FRENCH, FINK MARKLE, Appellants., 274 A.D. 982 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1948)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1948-12-13
Topic: general

MATTER OF BOWERY SAVINGS BANK, 274 App. Div. 982 (1948) In the Matter of BOWERY SAVINGS BANK, Respondent.ERNEST F. EIDLITZ et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name ofEIDLITZ, FRENCH, FINK MARKLE, Appellants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. December 13, 1948. Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF BOWERY SAVINGS BANK, 274 App. Div. 982 (1948). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF BOWERY SAVINGS BANK,274 App. Div. 982(1948)

In the Matter of BOWERY SAVINGS BANK, Respondent.

ERNEST F. EIDLITZ et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of

EIDLITZ, FRENCH, FINK MARKLE, Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

December 13, 1948.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Present — Peck, P.J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.