Opinion · Nylaw New York

BERG v. MOSKOWITZ, 270 App. Div. 838 (1946)

EMANUEL BERG, Respondent, v. DAVID MOSKOWITZ, Appellant, et al., Defendants., 270 A.D. 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1946)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1946-03-22
Topic: general

BERG v. MOSKOWITZ, 270 App. Div. 838 (1946) EMANUEL BERG, Respondent, v. DAVID MOSKOWITZ, Appellant, et al., Defendants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. March 22, 1946.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BERG v. MOSKOWITZ, 270 App. Div. 838 (1946). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BERG v. MOSKOWITZ,270 App. Div. 838(1946)

EMANUEL BERG, Respondent, v. DAVID MOSKOWITZ, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

March 22, 1946.

In view of the nature of the complaint, the question as to whether the alleged contract contravenes the Statute of Frauds should await determination at a trial where there may be a full adducement of all pertinent facts. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements.

Present — Martin, P.J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Peck, JJ.