Opinion · Nylaw New York

FEINSTEIN v. KAYE, 270 App. Div. 765 (1946)

MORRIS FEINSTEIN et al., Appellants, v. ARTHUR A. KAYE et al., Individuallyand as Copartners Doing Bus. under the Name of MONROE, BYRNE KAYE, etal., Respondents.LILLIAN FEINSTEIN et al., Appellants, v. BROOKLYN EDISON Co., INC.,Respondent. (Action No. 1.)MORRIS FEINSTEIN, Appellant, v. BROOKLYN EDISON Co., INC., Respondent.(Action No. 2.), 270 A.D. 765 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of N

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1946-01-21
Topic: general

FEINSTEIN v. KAYE, 270 App. Div. 765 (1946) MORRIS FEINSTEIN et al., Appellants, v. ARTHUR A. KAYE et al., Individuallyand as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of MONROE, BYRNE KAYE, etal., Respondents.LILLIAN FEINSTEIN et al., Appellants, v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FEINSTEIN v. KAYE, 270 App. Div. 765 (1946). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FEINSTEIN v. KAYE,270 App. Div. 765(1946)

MORRIS FEINSTEIN et al., Appellants, v. ARTHUR A. KAYE et al., Individually

and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of MONROE, BYRNE KAYE, et

al., Respondents.

LILLIAN FEINSTEIN et al., Appellants, v. BROOKLYN EDISON COMPANY, INC.,

Respondent. (Action No. 1.)

MORRIS FEINSTEIN, Appellant, v. BROOKLYN EDISON COMPANY, INC., Respondent.

(Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

January 21, 1946.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.

Present — Lewis, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.