Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF BRODERICK v. CT OF GEN. SESSIONS OF CTY., 269 App. Div. 840 (1945)

In the Matter of EDWARD v. BRODERICK, Petitioner, against COURT OF GENERALSESSIONS OF THE COUNTY OF N.Y., Respondent., 269 A.D. 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1945)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1945-06-27
Topic: general

MATTER OF BRODERICK v. CT OF GEN. SESSIONS OF CTY., 269 App. Div. 840 (1945) In the Matter of EDWARD V. BRODERICK, Petitioner, against COURT OF GENERALSESSIONS OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF BRODERICK v. CT OF GEN. SESSIONS OF CTY., 269 App. Div. 840 (1945). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF BRODERICK v. CT OF GEN. SESSIONS OF CTY.,269 App. Div. 840(1945)

In the Matter of EDWARD V. BRODERICK, Petitioner, against COURT OF GENERAL

SESSIONS OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

June 27, 1945.

Without in any way attempting to excuse the misconduct of the petitioner herein, but in view of the fact that said misconduct occurred under circumstances where he was attempting to defend his client charged with murder in the first degree and may have been caused by an excess of zeal, we modify the punishmentPage 841imposed by changing same to a fine of $250 to cover the four specifications charged. Determination unanimously modified accordingly and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.