Opinion · Nylaw New York

SONDERLICK v. SIMMONS, 267 App. Div. 862 (1944)

EMIL J. SONDERLICK, Appellant, v. THOMAS H. SIMMONS et al., Defendants, andTHOMAS J. HALLINAN, Defendant-Respondent., 267 A.D. 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1944)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1944-02-18
Topic: general

SONDERLICK v. SIMMONS, 267 App. Div. 862 (1944) EMIL J. SONDERLICK, Appellant, v. THOMAS H.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SONDERLICK v. SIMMONS, 267 App. Div. 862 (1944). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SONDERLICK v. SIMMONS,267 App. Div. 862(1944)

EMIL J. SONDERLICK, Appellant, v. THOMAS H. SIMMONS et al., Defendants, and

THOMAS J. HALLINAN, Defendant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

February 18, 1944.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ. [Seepost, p. 902.]