Opinion · Nylaw New York

FEINBERG v. WALDORF ICE CREAM CORPORATION, 266 App. Div. 964 (1943)

BENJAMIN FEINBERG, Respondent, v. WALDORF ICE CREAM Corp., Appellant., 266 A.D. 964 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1943)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1943-10-04
Topic: general

FEINBERG v. WALDORF ICE CREAM CORPORATION, 266 App. Div. 964 (1943) BENJAMIN FEINBERG, Respondent, v. WALDORF ICE CREAM CORPORATION, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. October 4, 1943.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FEINBERG v. WALDORF ICE CREAM CORPORATION, 266 App. Div. 964 (1943). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FEINBERG v. WALDORF ICE CREAM CORPORATION,266 App. Div. 964(1943)

BENJAMIN FEINBERG, Respondent, v. WALDORF ICE CREAM CORPORATION, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

October 4, 1943.

Appeal from an order granting the examination before trial of defendant, through its president. Order modified on the law by striking therefrom items 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, and 21 and, as so modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant, the examination to proceed on five days' notice. The items struck out were improper. Close, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.