Opinion · Nylaw New York

BOLTE v. OPAL THEATRE, INC., 263 App. Div. 986 (1942)

JOHN C. BOLTE, Respondent, v. OPAL THEATRE, INC., & Others, Appellants,Impleaded with Others, Defendants., 263 A.D. 986 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1942)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1942-03-27
Topic: general

BOLTE v. OPAL THEATRE, INC., 263 App. Div. 986 (1942) JOHN C. BOLTE, Respondent, v. OPAL THEATRE, INC., and Others, Appellants,Impleaded with Others, Defendants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BOLTE v. OPAL THEATRE, INC., 263 App. Div. 986 (1942). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BOLTE v. OPAL THEATRE, INC.,263 App. Div. 986(1942)

JOHN C. BOLTE, Respondent, v. OPAL THEATRE, INC., and Others, Appellants,

Impleaded with Others, Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

March 27, 1942.

The equities involved can best be disposed of after a full disclosure of all the facts upon a trial. Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Martin, P.J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.