Opinion · Nylaw New York
MATTER OF GOLDMEER v. PIANSKY, 260 App. Div. 976 (1940)
In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: LEWIS GOLDMEER, JudgmentCreditor, Respondent, v. CELIA ROTHSTEIN PIANSKY & Another, JudgmentDebtors.SHERIDAN P. WAIT & ANTHONY J. LABELLE, Third Parties, Appellants., 260 A.D. 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1940)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1940-11-20
- Topic
- general
MATTER OF GOLDMEER v. PIANSKY, 260 App. Div. 976 (1940) In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: LEWIS GOLDMEER, JudgmentCreditor, Respondent, v. CELIA ROTHSTEIN PIANSKY and Another, JudgmentDebtors.SHERIDAN P. WAIT and ANTHONY J.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF GOLDMEER v. PIANSKY, 260 App. Div. 976 (1940). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
MATTER OF GOLDMEER v. PIANSKY,260 App. Div. 976(1940)
In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: LEWIS GOLDMEER, Judgment
Creditor, Respondent, v. CELIA ROTHSTEIN PIANSKY and Another, Judgment
Debtors.
SHERIDAN P. WAIT and ANTHONY J. LABELLE, Third Parties, Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
November 20, 1940.
Present — Hill, P.J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.