Opinion · Nylaw New York

SCHATZ v. RECTOR, 256 App. Div. 1060 (1939)

IRVING SCHATZ, Appellant, v. RECTOR, CHURCH WARDENS & VESTRYMEN OFTRINITY CHURCH IN THE CITY OF N.Y. & WILLIAM S. SUSSMAN, INCORPORATED,Respondents., 256 A.D. 1060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1939)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1939-04-14
Topic: general

SCHATZ v. RECTOR, 256 App. Div. 1060 (1939) IRVING SCHATZ, Appellant, v. THE RECTOR, CHURCH WARDENS AND VESTRYMEN OFTRINITY CHURCH IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK and WILLIAM S. SUSSMAN, INCORPORATED,Respondents.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SCHATZ v. RECTOR, 256 App. Div. 1060 (1939). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SCHATZ v. RECTOR,256 App. Div. 1060(1939)

IRVING SCHATZ, Appellant, v. THE RECTOR, CHURCH WARDENS AND VESTRYMEN OF

TRINITY CHURCH IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK and WILLIAM S. SUSSMAN, INCORPORATED,

Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

April 14, 1939.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.