Opinion · Nylaw New York

FISHER v. GOETSCHIUS, 253 App. Div. 910 (1938)

HAROLD E. FISHER & MAURICE L. BUELL, Copartners, Doing Bus. under theFirm Name & Style of Am. CARBONIC Eng’g CO., Respondents, v.LILLIAN H. GOETSCHIUS, Also Known as LILLIAN GOETSCHIUS, Appellant, andOthers, Defendants., 253 A.D. 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1938)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1938-02-18
Topic: general

FISHER v. GOETSCHIUS, 253 App. Div. 910 (1938) HAROLD E. FISHER and MAURICE L. BUELL, Copartners, Doing Business under theFirm Name and Style of AMERICAN CARBONIC ENGINEERING CO., Respondents, v.LILLIAN H.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FISHER v. GOETSCHIUS, 253 App. Div. 910 (1938). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FISHER v. GOETSCHIUS,253 App. Div. 910(1938)

HAROLD E. FISHER and MAURICE L. BUELL, Copartners, Doing Business under the

Firm Name and Style of AMERICAN CARBONIC ENGINEERING CO., Respondents, v.

LILLIAN H. GOETSCHIUS, Also Known as LILLIAN GOETSCHIUS, Appellant, and

Others, Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

February 18, 1938.

Order denying motion for an order canceling a stipulation of settlement and all orders made thereon, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale and to restore the action to the calendar for trial, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.