Opinion · Nylaw New York

GRAY v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, 253 App. Div. 753 (1937)

HORACE M. GRAY, Appellant, v. Md. Cas. Co., Defendant, & PAULL. BLEAKLEY, Respondent., 253 A.D. 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1937)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1937-12-24
Topic: general

GRAY v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, 253 App. Div. 753 (1937) HORACE M. GRAY, Appellant, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant, and PAULL.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed GRAY v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, 253 App. Div. 753 (1937). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

GRAY v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY,253 App. Div. 753(1937)

HORACE M. GRAY, Appellant, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant, and PAUL

L. BLEAKLEY, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

December 24, 1937.

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and to compel respondent Bleakley to assign a certain mortgage, defendant Bleakley moved for summary judgment. Judgment in favor of respondment Bleakley and dismissing the complaint as to him unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order dismissed as the order is not printed.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.