Opinion · Nylaw New York

IMPERIAL v. PHILLIPS, 248 App. Div. 775 (1936)

ANTHONY J. IMPERIAL, for Himself & All Others Similarly Situated,Respondent, v. ELLIS L. PHILLIPS & Others, Defendants.THOMAS P. FITZSIMMONS & Another, Plaintiffs; WILLIAM N. MILLER & WILLIAME. O'REILLY, JR., JEROME SAALBERG, BEATRIX SAALBERG, HERMAN SAALBERG andHENRY L. SCHENK, as Ex’[r, x]s of & Trs. under the Last Will andTestament of JACOB SAALBERG, Deceased, SOL MARKS, Appellants, v. LONG ISL

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1936-01-01
Topic: general

IMPERIAL v. PHILLIPS, 248 App. Div. 775 (1936) ANTHONY J. IMPERIAL, for Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,Respondent, v. ELLIS L.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed IMPERIAL v. PHILLIPS, 248 App. Div. 775 (1936). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

IMPERIAL v. PHILLIPS,248 App. Div. 775(1936)

ANTHONY J. IMPERIAL, for Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,

Respondent, v. ELLIS L. PHILLIPS and Others, Defendants.

THOMAS P. FITZSIMMONS and Another, Plaintiffs; WILLIAM N. MILLER and WILLIAM

E. O'REILLY, JR., JEROME SAALBERG, BEATRIX SAALBERG, HERMAN SAALBERG and

HENRY L. SCHENK, as Executors of and Trustees under the Last Will and

Testament of JACOB SAALBERG, Deceased, SOL MARKS, Appellants, v. LONG ISLAND

LIGHTING COMPANY and Others, Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

June, 1936.

Order consolidating actions affirmed, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The court understandspro ratato mean one-fourth, there now being four plaintiffs. Although the court disposes of this matter in order to save further time and expense, the motion should have been made in New York county. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.