Opinion · Nylaw New York

EASTERN STATES PETROLEUM CO. v. WARNER-QUINLAN CO., 248 App. Div. 708 (1936)

E. STATES PETROLEUM Co., Plaintiff, v. WARNER-QUINLAN COMPANY,Defendant-Appellant, & AUGUSTA M. SMYTHE & GEORGE A. CANNAN, Copartners,etc., Impleaded-Defendants-Respondents., 248 A.D. 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1936)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1936-01-01
Topic: general

EASTERN STATES PETROLEUM CO. v. WARNER-QUINLAN CO., 248 App. Div. 708 (1936) EASTERN STATES PETROLEUM COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. WARNER-QUINLAN COMPANY,Defendant-Appellant, and AUGUSTA M. SMYTHE and GEORGE A.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed EASTERN STATES PETROLEUM CO. v. WARNER-QUINLAN CO., 248 App. Div. 708 (1936). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

EASTERN STATES PETROLEUM CO. v. WARNER-QUINLAN CO.,248 App. Div. 708(1936)

EASTERN STATES PETROLEUM COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. WARNER-QUINLAN COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant, and AUGUSTA M. SMYTHE and GEORGE A. CANNAN, Copartners,

etc., Impleaded-Defendants-Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

June, 1936.

Order denying motion of defendant-appellant for a preference, and order in so far as it adheres, on reargument, to the original decision, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for a preference granted. No opinion.

Present — Martin, P.J., McAvoy, Townley, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.