Opinion · Nylaw New York

RICH WOLF, INC. v. MADISON SQUARE-BRIEGER PRESS, 246 App. Div. 800 (1936)

RICH WOLF, INC., & Others, Respondents, v. MADISON SQUARE-BRIEGER PRESSCORP., Appellant, Impleaded with Another., 246 A.D. 800 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1936)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1936-01-01
Topic: general

RICH WOLF, INC. v. MADISON SQUARE-BRIEGER PRESS, 246 App. Div. 800 (1936) RICH WOLF, INC., and Others, Respondents, v. MADISON SQUARE-BRIEGER PRESSCORP., Appellant, Impleaded with Another.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. January, 1936.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed RICH WOLF, INC. v. MADISON SQUARE-BRIEGER PRESS, 246 App. Div. 800 (1936). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

RICH WOLF, INC. v. MADISON SQUARE-BRIEGER PRESS,246 App. Div. 800(1936)

RICH WOLF, INC., and Others, Respondents, v. MADISON SQUARE-BRIEGER PRESS

CORP., Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

January, 1936.

Action for commissions based on written contracts whereby defendant corporation employed plaintiffs to procure a purchaser for certain machinery and equipment owned by defendant corporation. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Martin, P.J., McAvoy, O'Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.