Opinion · Nylaw New York

VERRILLI v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, 243 App. Div. 581 (1934)

ALBERT A. VERRILLI, Respondent, v. Gen. MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION,Appellant., 243 A.D. 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1934)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1934-01-01
Topic: general

VERRILLI v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, 243 App. Div. 581 (1934) ALBERT A. VERRILLI, Respondent, v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION,Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed VERRILLI v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, 243 App. Div. 581 (1934). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

VERRILLI v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION,243 App. Div. 581(1934)

ALBERT A. VERRILLI, Respondent, v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION,

Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

December, 1934.

Action in conversion to recover damages for a wrongful seizure in this State of an automobile sold by defendant's assignor in New Jersey under a conditional bill of sale to a person whose legal successor plaintiff claimed to be. Judgment, order denying motion for a new trial and order granting plaintiff's motion to amend the judgmentnunc pro tuncreversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. In order to invoke the provisions of section 74 Pers. Prop. of the Personal Property Law, it was necessary for plaintiff to prove he was the legal successor of the conditional vendee. Plaintiff purchased the automobile in this State from one Mann or a corporation controlled by him. There was no proof that Mann or the corporation had any legal right or title to the automobile. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.