Opinion · Nylaw New York

BAKKER v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, 240 App. Div. 880 (1933)

GEORGE M. BAKKER, an Infant, by SIMON BAKKER, His Guardian ad Litem, andSIMON BAKKER, Respondents, v. AETNA LIFE Ins. Co. OF HARTFORD,CONNECTICUT, Appellant.[fn*], 240 A.D. 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1933)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1933-01-01
Topic
general

BAKKER v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, 240 App. Div. 880 (1933) GEORGE M. BAKKER, an Infant, by SIMON BAKKER, His Guardian ad Litem, andSIMON BAKKER, Respondents, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD,CONNECTICUT, Appellant.[fn*]Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BAKKER v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, 240 App. Div. 880 (1933). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BAKKER v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD,240 App. Div. 880(1933)
GEORGE M. BAKKER, an Infant, by SIMON BAKKER, His Guardian ad Litem, and
SIMON BAKKER, Respondents, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD,
CONNECTICUT, Appellant.fn*
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
November, 1933.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
Present — Finch, P.J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
  1. Affd.,264 N.Y. 150. ↩