Opinion · Nylaw New York

HARGRAVE v. FREIOT, 238 App. Div. 882 (1933)

WILLIAM HARGRAVE, Respondent, v. ALICE K. FREIOT & Others, Appellants.GEORGE RONEY, Respondent, v. ALICE K. FREIOT & Others, Appellants.FRANK J. SAUTTER, Respondent, v. ALICE K. FREIOT & Others, Appellants., 238 A.D. 882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1933)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1933-01-01
Topic: general

HARGRAVE v. FREIOT, 238 App. Div. 882 (1933) WILLIAM HARGRAVE, Respondent, v. ALICE K. FREIOT and Others, Appellants.GEORGE RONEY, Respondent, v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HARGRAVE v. FREIOT, 238 App. Div. 882 (1933). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HARGRAVE v. FREIOT,238 App. Div. 882(1933)

WILLIAM HARGRAVE, Respondent, v. ALICE K. FREIOT and Others, Appellants.

GEORGE RONEY, Respondent, v. ALICE K. FREIOT and Others, Appellants.

FRANK J. SAUTTER, Respondent, v. ALICE K. FREIOT and Others, Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

March, 1933.

Judgments and orders unanimously affirmed, with costs in one action.