Opinion · Nylaw New York
SILVERMAN v. FINKELSTEIN, 208 App. Div. 769 (1924)
MORRIS R. SILVERMAN, Respondent, v. NATHAN B. FINKELSTEIN, Appellant.MORRIS R. SILVERMAN, Respondent, v. NATHAN B. FINKELSTEIN, Appellant., 208 A.D. 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1924)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1924-01-01
- Topic
- general
SILVERMAN v. FINKELSTEIN, 208 App. Div. 769 (1924) MORRIS R. SILVERMAN, Respondent, v. NATHAN B.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed SILVERMAN v. FINKELSTEIN, 208 App. Div. 769 (1924). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
SILVERMAN v. FINKELSTEIN,208 App. Div. 769(1924)
MORRIS R. SILVERMAN, Respondent, v. NATHAN B. FINKELSTEIN, Appellant.
MORRIS R. SILVERMAN, Respondent, v. NATHAN B. FINKELSTEIN, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
February, 1924.
Present — Clarke, P.J., Dowling, Smith, Merrell and McAvoy, JJ.