Opinion · Nylaw New York

WRIGHT v. WRIGHT, 173 App. Div. 966 (1916)

Mary R. Wright & Others, Respondents, v. Mary R. Wright & Others,Impleaded with N.Y. Pub. Libr., Astor, Lenox & TildenFoundations, a Corp., etc., Respondent, & Knickerbocker Hospital,Appellant., 173 A.D. 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1916)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1916-01-01
Topic: general

WRIGHT v. WRIGHT, 173 App. Div. 966 (1916) Mary R. Wright and Others, Respondents, v. Mary R.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed WRIGHT v. WRIGHT, 173 App. Div. 966 (1916). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

WRIGHT v. WRIGHT,173 App. Div. 966(1916)

Mary R. Wright and Others, Respondents, v. Mary R. Wright and Others,

Impleaded with New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox and Tilden

Foundations, a Corporation, etc., Respondent, and Knickerbocker Hospital,

Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

May, 1916.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Clarke, P.J., Laughlin, Scott, Smith and Davis, JJ.